On one hand, it's fun because it's football. On the other, it's frustrating because it's EA. The Grounds game modes can be fun, but it's not nearly as good as it could be. 1v1s, 2v2s, and 3v3s feel a lot like street football, which is welcome. A lot of the other game modes are questionable. The open world itself isn't that interesting, yet that was the main concept behind The Grounds. It feels rushed and the purpose of it isn't clear. The different stores you can visit to buy apparel and equipment are basically all the same. The matchmaking and queue system being contained within a single Ground server is rather poor and most of the time, there will only be a few game modes you can actually play because they are the only ones players are queuing for. There's nothing worth playing in The Grounds right now that couldn't have been thrown onto a menu rather than building a town around it. It's as if they just copied the NBA 2K concept but didn't think much about the purpose or objectives. There are many technical issues like queuing into repeated disconnections. Also had these issues in Ultimate Team, and it's not just me -- a lot of players are complaining about the same thing. I've experienced many bugs with the UI, like getting elements stuck and they won't go away without a restart, or just straight up getting stuck on a screen and being unable to back out of it. This was happening in last year's game too, especially when you check the season pass progress screen. I'm confused why a UI bug like that is still affecting the game over a year later. Expect many visual bugs in The Grounds. I've seen many, like my player's jersey being tucked in when I've clearly selected it not to be, my player randomly changing skin tone in a match, but only on certain parts of his body, my authentic Spurs kit that somehow changes its badge logo to my in-game Club's logo. The online multiplayer modes can be fun, but don't expect them to be a simulation of the actual sport. Moreover, while they do reward skilled play, and the better player usually wins, they primarily reward meta play and abuse of overpowered mechanics and game systems. This is different than the standard expectation for a competitive game, which rewards strategy, game knowledge, mechanical mastery. For example, I've never been a top tier dribbler. I'm more passing focused. But give me a short woman with good dribbling stats and agility and I can consistently dribble the entire pitch into the opponent's box. I am not exaggerating. It's absurd. This also has the effect that you can't really play Ultimate Team the way you want while also playing at your competitive best. I want to win, but I also want to be able to play as a team that builds up gradually, baiting the opponent into a press, then suddenly changing from a slow build-up to a rapid break into a goal-scoring chance when I have an advantage. In reality, what Ultimate Team rewards is winning the the ball and getting it to your fastest player/best dribbler and carrying it with him the entire pitch. You can maybe make a pass or two depending on the scenario. You are basically gimping yourself if you don't play this way, and adapt to defending against it with high pace defenders. This has been a problem in Ultimate Team pretty much ever since it began. If you want something closer to real football, try a single player career mode experience with sliders tuned specifically to make the game as realistic as possible. You can find sliders made by the community for this purpose. I recommend it because I have fun playing it. People like me who enjoy football and sports gaming can definitely enjoy this game. But it's also a very frustrating game and nowhere near as good as it could be.
Review Map › Games › EA SPORTS FC™ 27
Review Map · mapped 1 October
EA SPORTS FC™ 27
53%Mixed
of all 6,046 reviews on Steam51%▼ 2
recommend it, last 7 days2,918First week
new reviews, last 7 daysPart of Review Explorer, $29 a month
What players say most in the latest 200 reviews
Click a theme to read an example reviewPraise first, then complaints.
Example reviewBugs and crashes
Not recommended3 hours playedEnglishTerrible bugs galore save your money input delays, stutters, freezing and weird little bugs with subtitles going weird when you move the camera during cut scenes you could spend hours in the menus changing setting it ain’t gonna fix an unpolished product that shouldn’t of even hit the shelves yet
Bars compare each theme with the one mentioned most. We don’t print counts: 200 recent reviews are a sample, not a measure of the game.
New Steam reviews each day
The last 7 days against the 7 before. Point at a day for its counts.
Recommended, last 7 days1,489Not recommended, last 7 days1,429
Most helpful reviews, 24 to 30 September
Steam’s top-ranked review for and against it in these 7 days, in English. Votes as they stood when this map was made.
I can only speak for Career Mode as I don't play the brainrotted ping-pong game-mode that is Ultimate Team, but I have to say that the gameplay on Authentic does feel the best it ever has. Players slide and slip, the CPU tackles, makes fouls, pulls your shirt, takes you down and it generally has a better overall footballing feel to it than most other EA FCs. The transfers and contracts are incredible and a massive upgrade. With that said: How on Earth can you charge upwards of 100 bucks for a game that is THIS filled with bugs? For starters it wouldn't let us launch the game unless you uninstalled just about every other anti-cheat on your PC. There's audio bugs, visual bugs, and so on... There are bugs that have existed for years (blue eyebrows I'm looking at you) that you still haven't fixed, lmao. BUT! The biggest monstrosity? The UI. What the f*ck is this Ultimate Team inspired UI? It takes away any immersion you might have had. I don't want to look at grey cards with 0 info, I want to see my players morale, the nationality, etc. Give it a more footballing feel. Why does the UI progressively somehow get worse? Incredible.
Reviews by language
Each language’s share of its reviews, and how many in that language recommend it.
| Language | Reviews | Share | Recommend itthe tick is every language, 53%; the chip is the gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | 2,186 | 36% | 53%0 |
| Russian | 580 | 10% | 49%−4 |
| Turkish | 500 | 8% | 56%+3 |
| Simplified Chinese | 435 | 7% | 35%−18 |
| Spanish | 435 | 7% | 56%+3 |
| Portuguese - Brazil | 382 | 6% | 57%+4 |
| German | 346 | 6% | 52%−1 |
| Polish | 326 | 5% | 66%+13 |
| 21 other languages | 861 | 14% |
All reviews ever, as Steam counts them, with each language’s own Steam score.
Steam didn’t answer for every language, so a few may be missing.
Review Explorer
Compare it with any Steam games.
For market research and competitive intelligence: map any game whenever you like, compare up to five side by side, and keep the ones you follow on a watchlist.
- Map any game, as often as you likeFree: 3 new games a day, 10 when signed in
- Compare up to five games side by side
- A watchlist: the games you follow, one click away
- Refresh any map to today
- 10% off one Review Atlas a month
Already a member? Sign in
PEAK
94%Very Positiverecommend it, of 376,159 reviews
1,808 new reviews, last 7 days
1Great with friends2Funny moments3Replayability4Bugs and crashes5Lost my progress
WEBFISHING
97%Overwhelmingly Positiverecommend it, of 70,479 reviews
38 new reviews, last 7 days
1Great with friends2Hard to put down3Atmosphere4Bugs and crashes5Lost my progress
Big Walk
96%Overwhelmingly Positiverecommend it, of 39,975 reviews
1,292 new reviews, last 7 days
1Great with friends2Atmosphere3Looks great4Bad solo5Funny momentsGold: a theme two or more of them share. Point at one to find it in the others. In Review Explorer this is the start: each day’s reviews, every theme with the reviews behind it, and who reviews them in every language. Open it ↗︎