This game is very fun for solo play for about 8 hours. I imagine this could be fun for longer with friends playing it as well. Like most negative reviews have pointed out, the game has a soft cap on how fast you can go because of the number of selling ports being locked. I think after 8ish hours I became locked where my progress is not limited on the number of robots I have or how much time I spend sweeping, but it's locked by how fast you can sell. Some version of a speed upgrade for the selling ports or just having more options to sell would make it more enjoyable I think. Overall once you reach the endgame upgrades and buildings you end up running it overnight to complete the map. Still... for 8 dollars, cant complain about the content that is there. If you want a factorio style game and level of content, then pay for factorio instead
Review Map › Games › Moon Sweepers
Review MapReview ExplorerReview AtlasSee pricing
Moon Sweepers
78%Mostly Positive
of all 6,435 reviews on Steam, keys includedBought on Steam 5,903 · 78%Keys 532 · 82%
Steam’s store page counts only copies bought on Steam, so it shows 5,903 reviews and 78%.
77%about the same
recommend the game, last 7 days3,867▲ 55%
new reviews, last 7 daysPart of Review Explorer, $29 a month
What players talk about in the latest 200 reviews
ClickTap a theme to read real reviews that say it
Praise
Complaints
Bars compare each theme with the one mentioned most. We don’t print counts: 200 recent reviews are a sample, not a measure of the game.
New Steam reviews each day
The last 7 days against the 7 before. Point atTap a day for its counts. Steam’s daily chart counts only copies bought on Steam.
Recommended, last 7 days2,731Not recommended, last 7 days852Recommend the game, last 7 days76%
| Day | Recommended | Not recommended | Recommending the game |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 October, 7 days before | 0 | 0 | too few |
| 23 October, 7 days before | 130 | 49 | 73% |
| 24 October, 7 days before | 208 | 88 | 70% |
| 25 October, 7 days before | 285 | 81 | 78% |
| 26 October, 7 days before | 331 | 80 | 81% |
| 27 October, 7 days before | 353 | 115 | 75% |
| 28 October, 7 days before | 474 | 115 | 80% |
| 29 October, last 7 days | 418 | 148 | 74% |
| 30 October, last 7 days | 418 | 127 | 77% |
| 31 October, last 7 days | 446 | 129 | 78% |
| 1 November, last 7 days | 463 | 134 | 78% |
| 2 November, last 7 days | 393 | 110 | 78% |
| 3 November, last 7 days | 317 | 106 | 75% |
| 4 November, last 7 days | 276 | 98 | 74% |
Most helpful reviews, 29 October to 4 November
Steam’s top-ranked review for and against the game in these 7 days, in English. Votes as they stood when this map was made.
Unfortunately, the game does not disclose how much AI has been used to make this game, it only discloses AI translations on its steam page. But upon playing the game it became quite clear that it was used in manufacturing the entire game. After playing a while and cleaning the moon for 0.020% we had nearly bought all the upgrades we could get. There were so many early game upgrades you could get but were of no use since it was just cheaper to buy the newer, bigger product. (from toothbrush to broom for instance) At first we put it down to it being a smaller studio, but the more we talked about it, the more weird things we found. Weird texts or completely missing texts in the manual. Then we started looking at our characters. You play this game in first person, so you don’t see your char a lot, but when we started looking there were all the tell-tale signs of AI usage, weird lines, text on the suit that was illegible, crooked lines that were going nowhere. Then we looked at the vehicles. Also weird lines, weird polygons and random seatbelts sticking out from cars etc. This all combined made me realise that this game was completely made with AI and not even tested past the first 10 hours of the game, since there is NOTHING to do but wait till the game completes. We cleaned the moon for 0.2% and we had already bought the final upgrade, which meant that there was no more gameplay than just buying more of those and wait till the game completed. It became apparent that the “devs” had not played/tested their game past 10 hours. I honestly feel scammed by the “dev” as this was not disclosed at all.
Recommended by playtime
This week’s reviews, split by hours played, and how many recommend the game.
Players with 50 hours or more mostly recommend the game. The first 2 hours are where it goes wrong.
ClickTap a row to read a real review from those players
Learn why with the Review Atlas
Steam Deck
Valve’s Steam Deck rating, and how Deck players recommend the game.
ClickTap the row to read a real review from a Steam Deck player
Reviews by language
How many of the game’s reviews are in its main languages, with the rest together, and how many in each recommend the game.
| Language | Reviews | Share | Players recommending the gameThe line marks all languages together, 78%. The chip shows how far each language is above or below it. |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | 3,623 | 56% | 79%+1 |
| German | 602 | 9% | 85%+7 |
| Russian | 514 | 8% | 77%−1 |
| Simplified Chinese | 280 | 4% | 53%−25 |
| French | 247 | 4% | 78%0 |
| Turkish | 225 | 3% | 81%+3 |
| Spanish | 141 | 2% | 77%−1 |
| Polish | 107 | 2% | 85%+7 |
| Other languages | 707 | 11% |
All reviews ever, as Steam counts them. Each language named has its own Steam score; Other languages holds every other language together.
